Home

Donate

 

 

Looking upstream at the Baker Dam on the Neponset River, in Lower Mills. This dam blocks river passage of a variety of fish species, and the dam neither holds back floodwaters nor provide energy. Neponset communities are discussing how to modify the dam to restore fish passage and improve water quality along the Neponset River.

Looking upstream at the Baker Dam in Lower Mills, at the border of Milton and Dorchester.

Neponset River Restoration Project

Restoration Benefits

 

 

Major Benefits of Restoration Project

River Restoration Restore Herring and Shad Runs.  Herring and shad—migratory fish species that swam up the Neponset River to lay their eggs for thousands of years—now have no access to the river beyond the Baker Dam. If the river were open, American shad, blueback herring, and rainbow smelt would come from the ocean to lay their eggs upstream, and their offspring would head back to the ocean in the fall. Shad and herring make up a large part of the diets of popular salt water sport fish such as striped bass and bluefish. Resident freshwater fish species, such as largemouth bass and sunfish, would also benefit. Dam removal is the only way to fully restore herring and shad runs.

River Restoration Will Improve Boating.  Removing the Baker and T&H Dams would greatly improve recreational boating on the Neponset River . The dams and their ponds would be replaced with a calm pools, smooth moving water, riffles and small rapids. The primary hazard to novice boaters—the dams—would be eliminated. The drudgery of carrying boats around dams would be replaced with a continuous “water-trail” from Walpole to Boston Harbor .

River Restoration Will Combine PCB Cleanup with Habitat & Recreational Improvements, while reducing human health risk from eating contaminated Neponset River fish incidental contact with the water and mud along the shore of the Neponset River is safe, even for children; and there is no danger in boating on the river. However, PCB’s in Neponset River sediments have poisoned bottom-feeding fish and pose a significant risk to people who eat them. A state Public Health Advisory warns people not to eat white suckers caught in the river from Walpole to Boston/Milton and to limit consumption of brown bullhead (hornpout) to two meals per month (children, nursing mothers and women who are or may become pregnant shouldn’t eat any). Additional fish species will be tested this summer. Dam removal would require the state to clean up most of the PCBs in the mud, reducing the risk of eating fish from the river and stopping the migration of PCBs into the Neponset River Estuary where health and environmental risks have not yet been assessed. If the dams remain, it is unlikely that any action will be taken to clean up the PCB’s. Even if a cleanup without dam removal were to occur, state hazardous waste rules would allow it to be conducted without regard to stream habitat, recreational use or post-cleanup aesthetics. A recent Boston Globe editorial describing GE’s PCB clean-up of the Housatonic River stated,What had been a tree-lined stream wandering through backyards is now a ‘ditch.’” The Neponset Ecological Restoration Project would save the lower Neponset from a similar fate.

River Restoration Will Reduce Long-term Maintenance Costs for State Taxpayers.   According to a recent study for the state Riverways Program, it would cost approximately $2 million to remove the two dams versus $7.2 million to maintain and operate them for another 30 years. In addition, federal grant money may be available for dam removal where as no such outside funding is available for dam maintenance. 

River Restoration Will Reduce Flooding.  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has concluded that the Baker and T&H Dams serve no flood control purpose. In fact, during 1968 during a relatively modest 40 year storm, the Baker Dam caused the Neponset Greenway bike path, the MBTA trolley station and the Wharf Street area to be flooded with up to three feet of water. A failure of the Baker Dam would be particularly dangerous because the dam is part of the foundations of the buildings on either side of the river. The latest engineering inspection of the Baker Dam concludes that it is a “significant hazard” dam, meaning that “failure may cause loss of life and damage to homes (and property).

River Restoration Will Restore Lost Wetlands and other key ecological features of the River.  Removing the dams creates the opportunity to restore a substantial portion of the wetlands that once bordered the river. Wetlands add to the natural beauty of the river, act as a nursery and habitat for a wide variety of fish and wildlife, help hold back floodwaters and filter pollutants out of the water.