Up
Project Background
Aesthetics
Flood Prevention
Historic Resources
Public Health
Cost Savings
Community
Fisheries
Hydropower
Boating & Recreation
Site Images
LE Mason

 

 

Home

Donate

Scroll down the page for access to more detailed discussion on other benefits.

June 2009 Update on the Lower Neponset River Restoration Consensus of the Citizens Advisory Committee

Speak up. Do you support dam removal on the Neponset River, want to be kept abreast of river restoration developments, or wish to get more involved? Contact NepRWA Advocacy Director Steve Pearlman at 781-575-0354 x304.

Learn more. What are PCBs, and how can they affect me?

See a map of the project sites.

Read the Fish Consumption Advisory.

View a letter of support from organizations that support the Neponset River restoration project.

Get updates on Neponset restoration by joining NepRWA's e-mail list. Write to rocklen@neponset.org and request to be added. 

 

 

Looking upstream at the Baker Dam on the Neponset River, in Lower Mills. This dam blocks river passage of a variety of fish species, and the dam neither holds back floodwaters nor provide energy. Neponset communities are discussing how to modify the dam to restore fish passage and improve water quality along the Neponset River.

Looking upstream at the Baker Dam in Lower Mills, at the border of Milton and Dorchester.

Neponset River Restoration Project

Hydropower

 

Industrial Uses and Hydropower

There have been no meaningful industrial uses of the Baker Dam or its impoundment since it was constructed in 1964. The Baker Chocolate Company ceased its operations at Lower Mills in 1965. By contrast the impoundment created by the T&H Dam was used by the Bay State Paper Company as a source for industrial process water until the late 1990s. However, Bay State Paper has closed its doors for good. Plans are in the works for a shopping center on the site of the former paper mill. It seems extremely unlikely that there might be any future industrial uses associated with either of these dams.  

Neither dam is currently used for hydropower generation, though it would be theoretically possible to retrofit one or both dams for hydropower purposes. Generally, however, it is not economically feasible to install hydropower generation facilities on such small dams even with today’s high electricity prices and with available renewable energy subsidies.

The cost of hydropower generation at either of these dams is even more prohibitive when one considers the substantial cost not only of retrofitting the dams, but of operating and maintaining these aging structures. 

Finally, implementation of hydropower facilities at either of these locations would require issuance of a permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or “FERC.” FERC would normally require provision of fish passage facilities as a precondition for issuing a permit, making the prospect of hydropower generation that much more economically infeasible.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 2008

 

Up ] Project Background ] Aesthetics ] Flood Prevention ] Historic Resources ] Public Health ] Cost Savings ] Community ] Fisheries ] [ Hydropower ] Boating & Recreation ] Site Images ] LE Mason ]